Connect with us

News

Trump, coronavirus and the politics of a pandemic

Donald Trump

The coronavirus outbreak has swept the globe and been declared a pandemic, but experts warn the response of some world leaders, including the administration of US President Donald Trump, has been anything but global. 

With more than 140,000 people in some 120 countries infected in the outbreak of the new coronavirus disease, officially known as COVID-19, the World Health Organization (WHO) has stressed that international cooperation is needed to contain the rapidly spreading virus.

But in recent days, both China, where the virus was first detected late last year, and the United States, which on Friday declared a national emergency, have shown nationalist tendencies in their political response.

Donald Trump
In this July 17, 2019, photo, President Donald Trump arrives to speak at a campaign rally at Williams Arena in Greenville, N.C. (AP Photo/Carolyn Kaster)

In the US, Trump’s approach to the virus has appeared more concerned with a political narrative than the public health threat, critics say, with some calling the president’s declaration of a national emergency too little, too late. 

“What we’re seeing is kind of fragmentation and politicisation along nationalist lines as the pandemic spreads and globalises,” Stephen Morrison, senior vice president of the Center for Strategic and International Studies and director of its Global Health Policy Center, told Al Jazeera.

In the Trump administration’s portrayal of the outbreak, he said, there has been a “nationalistic, neo-isolationist perspective of trying to pin the blame on the Chinese, pin the blame on the Europeans and trying to minimise or downplay the fact that wherever the virus originated, it’s among all of us, it’s inside of our borders”.

On Wednesday, the White House national security adviser, Robert O’Brien, accused China of “covering up” the virus when it first appeared. Meanwhile, Trump administration officials including Secretary of State Mike Pompeo in recent days have taken to calling the coronavirus the “Wuhan virus”, ignoring WHO’s guidelines and inciting rebuke from Beijing.

At the same time, with the number of cases falling in China and soaring abroad, Beijing has started to reject the generally-accepted assessment that the virus originated in Wuhan, the capital of the central Hubei province and the outbreak’s hardest-hit city.

On Thursday, foreign ministry spokesman Zhao Lijian said on Twitter that “it might be US army who brought the epidemic to Wuhan”, perpetuating a conspiracy theory that has been circulating online, without providing any evidence.

In Europe, the current epicentre of the pandemic according to WHO, European Union leaders condemned a travel ban announced by Trump on Thursday, which excluded the United Kingdom despite the country having a comparable amount of cases to many states in the bloc.

Trump said that decision was because of the UK’s “very strong borders” and not the two governments’ close ties in the wake of Britain’s departure from the EU.

“It’s not a very promising environment for getting high-level political leadership organised around how they’re going to deal with this as as a global community,” Morrison said. “If we are fragmenting along strategic rivalries and nationalist tendencies, and denialism, that’s moving in the opposite direction than what we should be moving towards – how are we going to figure out a way forward that bridges these divisions and emphasises the shared common good?”

Echoing that thought, Leana Wen, a physician and professor of public health at George Washington University, told Al Jazeera that leaders must heed the urging of the WHO to cooperate in overcoming the pandemic.  

“This is a public health emergency that knows no boundaries,” said Wen, who is also the former health commissioner for the city of Baltimore. “We all need to see that we’re in this together, and what will benefit one country will benefit the entire world. And similarly, what will harm one country will harm everyone else.”

Coronavirus, politics and the US

A presidential response to the coronavirus that initially appeared to focus on downplaying the threat has also had implications for the outbreak in the US, according to experts. 

In a March 7 op-ed in the New York Times, Jeremy Konyndyk, a senior policy fellow at the Center for Global Development, said that initially, “federal officialsresponded in a way that suited the narrative Mr Trump preferred”.

“It’s no coincidence that the coronavirus has broken out across the country as the president has continued to brag about keeping the disease outside America’s border,” he wrote. “Pretending we could wall out the virus not only gave the public a false sense of security, it also left the United States unready for the threat it now faces.”

Others have criticised what at times appeared to be a greater focus on the economy over the global health risk. Trump compared the coronavirus, which has no vaccine or known treatment regiment, to the flu as markets tanked on March 9, appearing to insinuate the current situation was overblown.

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *